| Those
Wacky Players in the Anti-Porn Movment
These vocal and well-respected researchers, such as Dr. Mary
Anne Layden, Dr. James B. Weaver, Dr. Judith Reisman, and Dr.
Jeffrey Satinover, to name only a few, are highly active, highly
visible, and Reisman and Satinover are involved not only in the
anti-pornography but also the anti-homosexuality movement. All
of these researchers’ anti-pornography testimonies before
a Senate subcommittee last November can be found
here.
Reismann
is one of the biggest activists
against “The Kinsey Report” and the upcoming
movie starring Liam Neeson and Laura Linney, and authored
the work "Kinsey, Sex and Fraud." She is also a vocal
anti-homosexual. Reisman had also been a prosecution witness
for the state of Ohio when it attempted to remove
photos by Robert Mapplethorpe from Cincinnati’s Contemporary
Arts Center.
Santinover
is a well respected anti-homosexual leader, authoring the work
“Homosexuality & The Politics of Truth” and is
involved with the organization P.A.T.H., Positive Alternative
to Homosexuality.
Layden is the Co-Director of the Sexual
Trauma and Psychopathology Program, Center for Cognitive Therapy
at the University of Pennsylvania and The Social Action Committee
for Women's Psychological Health, and has been an activist against
the Sports Illustrated swimsuit
issue. Pumpster recently lampooned
her Senate testimony.. We have little additional information
about her agenda, but we think her various authored papers, and
the testimony she gave before the Senate committee, reveals her
bias, ignorance, and quality of her cognitive resources.
The
closest things to a mainstream voice in our industry is Hustler
magazine, Larry Flynt.com,
and Feminists for Porn’s Nina Hartley. You can find a recent
piece authored by her here.
Definitely visit Mr. Flynt's site if you haven't already. Pornography
users and producers do not have a truly mainstream voice in television
or on radio, nor do they get to champion their views in front
of the U.S. legislature. There is no political action committee
for our industry, no NPO, no Porn Producers Council or Union.
We have a few organizations that defend us, first amendment proponents,
such as Feminists for Free Expression (FFE), American Civil Liberties
Union (ACLU), National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC), and
the Libertarian Party. But against us? American Family Association
(AFA), National Law Center for Children and Families (NLC), Family
Research Council (FRC), SpiderWomen, National Coalition for the
Protection of Children and Families (NCPCF), Enough is Enough,
Concerned Women for America (CWA), Morality in Media (MIM), American
Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) to name only a few.
Most of these groups use family values and children much like
environmentalists had used the spotted owl to halt logging in
the Northwest during the 90's. Just as the environmentalists could
not demand a stop to logging because, in their opinion, it is
detrimental, these faith-based anti-porn organizations cannot
claim pornography is harmful simply because it goes against their
chosen religious doctrine. Instead, they use the protection of
children as the main argument in their anti-porn defense. We all
know children have no place in or around pornography, but they
hold pornographers accountable instead of playing a more pro-active,
and protective, role in these children's lives. And why is this?
In reality, the children are simply pawns in their game to crush
not only freedom of sexuality but also women's rights.
The anti-porn battle began with early patriarchal leaders outlawing
goddess worship and pagan rituals that revered the nude female
form--symbolized in the vagina, breasts, and swollen womb--to
promote male-centered rule and divinity. These leaders manipulated
Christianity in order to designate themselves as divinely chosen
emperors or church leaders in order to legitimize their elite
power and the enormous wealth they extracted from subjects rendered
ineffectual by scheming legislation.
This is the real issue. The ubiquity of pornography today, with
the advent of the Internet, threatens to normalize sexuality,
set the nude female form in a position of reverence, and lead
us away from not the teachings of Christ, but the political
institution of Christianity--the fear-based apparatus
designed to control the populace and assure the power and wealth
of an elite male oligarchy who have existed unmolested for millennia
and who are responsible for moving our planet toward the brink
of ruin.
Click
here and see the anti-porn article on Xbiz and get involved now.
|